Overview
ASP.NET
The chose we thought we would never make but ended up happy with.
Great tool to use, reliable, dependable, and fast, but not too easy
ASP.Net a way of development.
A great development suite for small business!
ASP.NET Razor Visual Studio 2022: ROI of integration with SAP HANA and SQL Server
With ASP.NET you can build web apps quickly and securely.
ASP.Net
Web application masterpiece.
If you're using it, you know, if you're not, you probably haven't updated yourself since ASP.NET was WebForms.
ASP.NET is the Most Effective Web-Framework
ASP.NET - A big step forward in its day, but essentially lacklustre in modern times
ASP.NET Review
Seasoned ASP.NET developer
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
3 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Progress Telerik?
With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins…
What is Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition?
Syncfusion’s Essential Studio Enterprise Edition is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible and are optimized for high performance. According to Syncfusion, the suite has users among 80%…
Product Demos
1# Asp.Net Core 2.0 MVC - Demo
ASP.NET MVC 5 Step by Step: Part 3 Product Application Demo Project (CRUD Operation)
1. APPLICATION DEMO - Asp.Net CORE MVC
Learn ASP.NET Core MVC (.NET 6) - Full Course
ASP.NET Zero — Introduction and Features
MVC APPLICATION DEMO (eCommerce application) | ASP.NET MVC
Product Details
- About
- Tech Details
What is ASP.NET?
ASP.NET Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(172)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-17 of 17)The chose we thought we would never make but ended up happy with.
- It has a great documentation so new or experienced, you appreciate quick access to quality information
- It’s very fast, uses less memory than initially expected that has decreased our costs after moving from python
- It speaks the language of the design patterns really well, so our backend apps are written fast together and connect to frontend systems flawlessly
- I wish there was more declarative programming like in Java Spring
- Would appreciate more community based tools rather than Microsoft only as any organizational changes may cause future risks
- I would like to see more native code inside of Docker containers for ultimate speed and minimal memory usage
A great development suite for small business!
- Pattern design.
- Site delivery to cloud.
- Visual studio integration.
- Ease of learning.
- Git integration.
- IIS configuration.
- Auto formatting improvements.
- Database integration for queries and inserts.
- Excellent for script language for HTML.
- Razor pages in Visual Studio 2022/.NET is the positive next step of web development.
- Cases of study to show the excellent performance of ASP.NET combined with Razor.
- Better integration with Amazon RDS database.
- Easier method to parse the JSON results from webservice's.
We use it to build anything from small internally-used applications to large web applications that scale to thousands and thousands of users.
- Build web applications with ease.
- Get up and running in minutes.
- Make it easier to vote on features that we want to see implemented.
The only reason we would prefer using e.g. NodeJS over ASP.NET is when we need to use a package that doesn't have a good alternative in the .NET ecosystem, which is rare. On such example is pdfkit, which we use to render PDF receipts.
ASP.NET is the Most Effective Web-Framework
- It's easy to install and configure, and it supports dependency injection.
- Code configuration is simple, and performance measures are excellent.
- It is cross-platform, expandable, and customizable.
- Making web forms obsolete was a mistake; instead, creating modern web forms that use the drag and drop UI is something we have come to expect from ASP.NET.
- It takes a long time for the NET collection to start up when running under IIS for some reason.
- Allows for rapid application development
- A very solid and well-defined foundation and programming model
- Fairly performant
- Templating with razor is excellent
- MVC was a huge step forward in its day
- WebForms is absolutely awful (in my opinion it is an abomination), it tries to hide the nature of the web from the programmer to make things easier, but it actually makes it much much worse and much more complicated than if it hadn't hidden it.
- In my experience it can get unnecessarily complicated quickly - as you move towards the boundaries of what ASP.NET can do, as you will on any fairly complicated project, you realise you suddenly have to hook in to undocumented or obtusely documented functionality, and you will need to put in little bits of code you found on stack trace but you aren't sure why - because Microsoft tried to hide something from the programmer but you end up having to customise it anyway. This builds and builds.
- NET can be really really slow when running under IIS, for some reason the app pool is constantly shutdown due to idle, but when the next person hits a page - it takes, in computational terms, so long for the pool to start up - causing embarrassing delays.
- It is somewhat boring now and doesn't really stand up to modern simple alternatives, like Express on NodeJS.
Seasoned ASP.NET developer
- Built in support for dependency injection
- Easy to configure startup files
- High benchmarks in speed
- Cross platform support
- Plethora of tools built into the framework
- Razor needs improvement to match Angular
- Unit test automation
ASP.NET offers an easy, scaleable web framework
- Quick to set up and configure
- Easy to configure in code
- Expandable and customizable
- Fragmented version history makes it hard to know where to start
Great framework for Web Applications
- Build great backend APIs
- Connect to other systems
- Works great with other Microsoft technologies
- Development of ASP.NET goes so quickly that it sometimes is hard to keep up
- Documentation could have some more real world examples
- Cross platform support was not so good but is getting much better
ASP.NET for speedy and cheap development
- NET is very good at "write once, use often."
- Performance is excellent.
- Security is rock solid.
- Support is always there from MS.
- Older versions of ASP.NET have issues needing to be upgraded.
- There are version conflicts in older versions.
- Third party integration can sometimes take extra work.
Build anything you need for now and the future
- Flexible
- Extendable
- Feature rich
- Starting a new ASP.Net project can sometimes seem daunting to get all the initial libraries in place unless you use a predefined scaffold. This is getting better.
- You are tied to the Microsoft/Azure platforms for deployment of ASP.Net applications. However, Net Core helps alleviate this.
- Language choices (VB, C#, F#, C++) can seem a little daunting at times.
- Ease of use with drag and drop functionality; makes the learning curve less steep as new users are already familiar with this paradigm.
- Powerful .Net Framework libraries
- Control panel to manage and control the building of web applications
- Code-behind can be in C# or VB.NET
- It works very well other Microsoft tools but could have better integration with other platforms
- Fewer open-source projects to use as examples, templates, and code-snippets
- Can be cost-prohibitive for smaller companies or if your business requirements demand 3rd party (or additional) libraries, tools, etc.
Personally I started my career with ASP.NET before MVC arrived. The old ASP.NET tried to abstract the web environment which ended up complicating things and misleading young developers. ASP.NET and Microsoft in general have since greatly mended their ways and although it's not my go-to stack, ASP.NET MVC is a completely legitimate one.
- C# is a great language and .NET has a lot of powerful functionality like LINQ.
- Easy to integrate with SQL server and other Microsoft solutions (Entity Framework is great).
- Microsoft tools - get the latest updates and support. They usually have great offerings for early stage startups.
- Single page applications are much easier on a plain Javascript Stack-like client side frameworks or NodeJS.
- Heavily dependent on visual-studio and the Microsoft Stack.
- Still lacking in the ease of getting started and quickly deploying things.
- Hard to find good developers that don't have a bias for ASP.NET.
Personally I am more inclined to use client side solutions for web apps, or NodeJS if server side logic/rendering is needed. However ASP.net uses C# which is a great language, and the framework has everything you need for success.
We build all our apps with ASP.NET!
- NET is a rich framework which provides vast amounts of functionality, which helps speed up development
- NET is supported by an array of high-quality tooling from Microsoft, such as TFS and Visual Studio
- There a large community of experienced ASP.NET developers which means patterns and practices are well documented and there is also plenty of discussion opportunities within the community, such as conferences, meetups, and forums.
- The large user base means that recruitment can be easier
- Cost is the main one - Microsoft tooling and infrastructure can be very expensive
- Some developers are anti-Microsoft which means not everyone is enthusiastic about joining a "Microsoft house"
Super Fast Development
- Great Community support
- Amazing development environment and ecosystem including debugging
- Easy deployments
- Easy to find resources with this skillset
- Single page applications are still difficult to develop
- Cost can be a possible issue
- Not enough tools for SEO and ADA requirements
- Utilizes .NET framework and familiar languages such as C# which makes it very easy to learn.
- Native support for MVC via ootb templates.
- Web API 2 allows very easy creation of RESTful Web Services.
- It can get pricey in order to use the full feature set of VS enterprise (free community edition available).
- Potentially harder implementation of web applications when not using the native MS technologies such as IIS.
ASP.NET is very well suited for building web applications for users that have good experience with .NET framework and C#. The learning curve is very mild and allows for very quick development of applications because of all the templates that can be utilized (available with Visual Studio). Moreover, Visual Studio 2015/2017 community edition is free and contains a large set of features for developing, compiling and debugging ASP.NET applications. From personal experience with the introduction of Web API it is very easy to build RESTful APIs and it is a breeze to publish on IIS servers with a click of a button. Additional advantage is when using Azure services which also allows quick publishing of ASP.NET applications to the cloud with very little configuration needed.
I would assume that it is more difficult to jump to ASP.NET from a different technology and programming languages. Even within ASP.NET it can be a bit of a steep learning curve to move from Web Forms to MVC for example.
- Net MVC provides lot of flexibility in creating your custom handlers, custom events as per your business needs. The entity framework works well with ASP.net.
- Setup/Getting up to speed is really easy. ASP.NET has a healthy community of users. We can get help from MSDN articles and many blogs/articles.
- MVC 6 has some really cool features/support for bootstrap.
- Recent technologies like Node.js and Angular are picking up fast. Most of the controls run at server which is a huge drawback when compared to other technologies.
- Out of the box support is missing for many features - Logging, caching (distributed).
- IIS setup is not easy/straight forward unless you go for simple deployment.